From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:12:41 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add push --set-upstream
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.1001151811270.3106@intel-tinevez-2-302>
In-Reply-To: <vpqy6jzuwpv.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>

Hi,

On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, Matthieu Moy wrote:

> Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi> writes:
> 
> > +		OPT_BIT('u', "set-upstream", &flags, "Set upstream for git pull", TRANSPORT_PUSH_SET_UPSTREAM),
> 
> I'd be in favor of --track for the option name. Not that it's the best
> name ever, but this is really doing the same job as branch --track and
> checkout --track, so it should have the same name.
> 
> Or the --track option of branch and checkout should be renamed as
> --set-upstream, but that seems a lot of trouble for little benefit.

Junio already complained that it is a bad name, basically because it is 
ambiguous.  If you are really pushing for --track, you will have to think 
of a compelling reasoning.

Ciao,
Dscho

P.S.: FWIW I think --set-upstream is really a good name.