From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 01:36:19 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH (v2) 2/2] rebase -i: teach --onto A...B syntax
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.1001090235520.4985@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
In-Reply-To: <4B47BE13.7070509@gmail.com>

Hi,

On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, A Large Angry SCM wrote:

> Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 15:31, Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> 
> > wrote:
> > > Thanks, I didn't know about that one.  But my general point is 
> > > still: we seem to have two implementations when the functionality of 
> > > one is actually a superset of the other.  As far as I can see, 
> > > anyway.  So the obvious way to reduce the duplicated code is to 
> > > simply eliminate the less-featureful implementation.
> > 
> > *cough* git sequencer *cough*
> 
> *cough* not in my ${PATH} *cough*

*cough* because that GSoC project failed in all but writing? *cough*