From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:32:21 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] diff --color-words -U0: fix the location of hunk headers
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0910301831190.5383@felix-maschine>
In-Reply-To: <7v3a50n6hw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Hi,

On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Markus Heidelberg <markus.heidelberg@web.de> writes:
> 
> > I try to reword:
> > With 2/3 and 3/3 I wanted to keep --color-words specific code in the
> > block starting with
> >
> > 	if (ecbdata->diff_words) {
> >
> > and didn't want to contaminate the block starting with
> >
> > 	if (line[0] == '@') {
> >
> > with non-hunk-header content.
> 
> The contamination was already done long time ago.

Actually, it was don on purpose.

> diff --git a/diff.c b/diff.c
> index b7ecfe3..8c66e4a 100644
> --- a/diff.c
> +++ b/diff.c
> @@ -541,14 +541,18 @@ struct emit_callback {
>  	FILE *file;
>  };
>  
> +/* In "color-words" mode, show word-diff of words accumulated in the buffer */
> +static void diff_words_flush(struct emit_callback *ecbdata)
> +{
> +	if (ecbdata->diff_words->minus.text.size ||
> +	    ecbdata->diff_words->plus.text.size)
> +		diff_words_show(ecbdata->diff_words);
> +}

Instead of this function, you can check the same at the beginning of 
diff_words_show().

The reason I did not do that was to avoid a full subroutine call, as I 
expected this code path to be very expensive.

Ciao,
Dscho