From: Johannes Schindelin Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:33:53 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add an option not to use link(src, dest) && unlink(src) when that is unreliable Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200904232116.10769.j6t@kdbg.org> Hi, On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Johannes Sixt wrote: > On Donnerstag, 23. April 2009, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > It seems that accessing NTFS partitions with ufsd (at least on my EeePC) > > has an unnerving bug: if you link() a file and unlink() it right away, > > the target of the link() will have the correct size, but consist of NULs. > > > > It seems as if the calls are simply not serialized correctly, as > > single-stepping through the function move_temp_to_file() works flawlessly. > > > > As ufsd is "Commertial software", I cannot fix it, and have to work > > "commercial software" I just quoted the license string of that wonderfully high-quality kernel module. Maybe I should have added the beloved "[sic!]". > > At the same time, it seems that this fixes msysGit issues 222 and 229 to > > assume that Windows cannot handle link() && unlink(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin > ... > > @@ -2225,7 +2225,9 @@ int move_temp_to_file(const char *tmpfile, const char > > *filename) { > > int ret = 0; > > > > - if (link(tmpfile, filename)) > > + if (unreliable_hardlinks) > > + ret = ~EEXIST; > > It took me a while to see why we need a tilde here, but it's ok. Perhaps this > helps others: > > + ret = ~EEXIST; /* anything but EEXIST */ Will do. > Nevertheless: > > Acked-by: Johannes Sixt Thanks. But it will have to wait for Saturday. Ciao, Dscho