From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:31:41 GMT
Subject: Re: bisect run, was Re: More git bisect modes
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0903051231070.6524@intel-tinevez-2-302>
In-Reply-To: <43d8ce650903050318g6ab81e6es9869b9f526c5eb24@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, John Tapsell wrote:

> 2009/3/5 Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>:
>
> > That reminds me of a personal gripe with "bisect run": You cannot use it
> > like this:
> >
> >        $ git bisect run 'make test'
> >
> > as it interprets 'make test' as a name of an executable.  That makes
> > 'bisect run' rather less useful to me.
> 
> A very quick test seems to show that:
> 
> $ git bisect run make test
> 
> Works as you want.  Maybe a quick example of this could be added to
> the man page.

Indeed, the source code agrees with you.

Thanks,
Dscho