From: Johannes Schindelin Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 18:57:18 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] don't append 'opaquelocktoken:' in PUT and MOVE Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Hi, On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Tay Ray Chuan wrote: > On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Johannes Schindelin > wrote: > > Why does request->lock->token have the prefix at all? > > While typing my reply, I realise it is unwarranted. Huh? What does that mean? Does lock->token have that prefix (including the colon) or not? Ciao, Dscho