From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:15:53 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] filter-branch: do not consider diverging submodules a 'dirty worktree'
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0902041915070.22763@intel-tinevez-2-302>
In-Reply-To: <7vvdrqt74k.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

Hi,

On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net> writes:
> 
> > Because if the repository is non-bare, then filter-branch updates the
> > work-tree at the end of the run; we don't want to overwrite uncommitted
> > work in this case.
> >
> > This behavior is a relic from cg-admin-rewritehist, I think. I've never
> > found it useful.
> 
> Ok, I think "read-tree -m -u HEAD" at the end sort of makes sense, if you
> filtered the branch you are currently sitting on.  Does that mean we do
> not have to barf on dirtyness if we can tell if the filter-branch will not
> touch the current branch at all?  Again, I am not suggesting it as an
> improvement, but I am trying to see if I am talking a total nonsense.

That's correct.  Checking if we would touch the current branch is too 
expensive here, that's why we don't do it.

> Is the reason why you haven't found it is useful is because you never 
> filter the current branch?

Well, _I_ certainly do, and I find it very useful.

Ciao,
Dscho