From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 09:03:31 GMT
Subject: Re: Fwd: git status options feature suggestion
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0810091101230.22125@pacific.mpi-cbg.de.mpi-cbg.de>
In-Reply-To: <81bfc67a0810082327q71b9d6apf2787eb8519031bb@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Caleb Cushing wrote:

> > How about "git ls-files -o"?
> 
> doh... hadn't even heard of that command.

Which is good!  As ls-files is listed as plumbing.  Users should not need 
to call ls-files, so I like your idea about adding --new, --untracked etc. 
to "git status" (I do not agree with others that "git status" has to stay 
that non-existant "git commit --dry-run").

Could you list exactly which options you want implemented?

Ciao,
Dscho