From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 11:36:43 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] completion: add branch options --contains --merged --no-merged
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0807081335470.4319@eeepc-johanness>
In-Reply-To: <7vprppvt7a.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

Hi,

On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org> writes:
> 
> > Eric Raible <raible@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Raible <raible@gmail.com>
> >
> > Trivially-Acked-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
> >
> > ;-)
> >
> > More completion support that probably should go to maint, as the
> > functionality in git-branch is in 1.5.6 but we (again) forgot to
> > make sure the completion was up-to-date prior to release.
> 
> I am actually getting more worried about completion code getting larger
> and larger without its performance impact not being looked at nor
> addressed adequately.  In my regular working tree:
> 
> 	$ echo Docu<TAB>
> 
> completes "mentation/" instantly, but:
> 
> 	$ git log -- Docu<TAB>
> 
> takes about 1.5 to 2 seconds to complete the same.

I noticed that myself, but did not have time to look into it.

It shows two bugs, actually: completions do not care about "--", and 
completing refs takes way too long.

Ciao,
Dscho