From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 21:36:45 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockfile: reset the correct signal
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0805262234210.30431@racer>
In-Reply-To: <20080526193513.GA9978@localhost>

Hi,

On Mon, 26 May 2008, Clemens Buchacher wrote:

> In the function remove_lock_file_on_signal(), the signal handler
> for SIGINT was reset, ignoring the parameter signo.
> 
> This did not pose a problem yet, as remove_lock_file_on_signal()
> was only registered as a SIGINT handler.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
> ---
> 
> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 10:34:11AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > Only from the patch did I understand that you actually meant:
> 
> Thank you for fixing that.

Unfortunately, the original patch is already in git.git.

> I also realized that using signals like that can cause races. Shouldn't 
> we use sigaction() instead of signal()?

Dunno.  The man page suggests it, but we have plenty of cases where we use 
signal().  And I think it might be less painful to implement a 
compat-wrapper for the platforms which differ from Linux' interpretation 
of signal().

Ciao,
Dscho