From: Ted Nyman Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 18:31:39 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] http: use unique tempfiles for packfile URI downloads Message-ID: In-Reply-To: > I share that sentiment. I am not entirely convinced by Ted's > response, since a major goal of the packfile URI feature, as I > understand it, is to allow the use of resumable protocols for > large transfers. Agreed. I was too quick to dismiss the loss of resumption. I'll take another look at preserving the predictable partial pack while preventing concurrent writers, including the handoff and stale-file cases Peff raised. Dumb HTTP has the same underlying concurrency issue, so I'll keep that path in mind as well before sending a reroll. Thanks, Ted