From: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 14:48:55 GMT Subject: [PATCH v3 04/15] bisect--helper: really retire --bisect-next-check Message-ID: In-Reply-To: From: Johannes Schindelin In 911aba14205 (bisect--helper: retire `--bisect-next-check` subcommand, 2021-09-13), we removed the usage string and the implementation, but not actually the option. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin --- builtin/bisect--helper.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/builtin/bisect--helper.c b/builtin/bisect--helper.c index 39556d60eab..658390952b2 100644 --- a/builtin/bisect--helper.c +++ b/builtin/bisect--helper.c @@ -1278,7 +1278,6 @@ int cmd_bisect__helper(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) { enum { BISECT_RESET = 1, - BISECT_NEXT_CHECK, BISECT_TERMS, BISECT_START, BISECT_AUTOSTART, @@ -1294,8 +1293,6 @@ int cmd_bisect__helper(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) struct option options[] = { OPT_CMDMODE(0, "bisect-reset", &cmdmode, N_("reset the bisection state"), BISECT_RESET), - OPT_CMDMODE(0, "bisect-next-check", &cmdmode, - N_("check whether bad or good terms exist"), BISECT_NEXT_CHECK), OPT_CMDMODE(0, "bisect-terms", &cmdmode, N_("print out the bisect terms"), BISECT_TERMS), OPT_CMDMODE(0, "bisect-start", &cmdmode, -- gitgitgadget