From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 09:07:37 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Run hooks in parallel
Message-ID: <acJUWcNwNOIFDL9B@pks.im>
In-Reply-To: <87h5q660un.fsf@gentoo.mail-host-address-is-not-set>

On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 05:07:28PM +0200, Adrian Ratiu wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2026, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> > Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@collabora.com> writes:
> >
> >> Range-diff v3 -> v4:
> >>  1:  6686d92867 =  1:  ec274c24e5 repository: fix repo_init() memleak due to missing _clear()
> >
> > This one is not included in the set.  This cover letter identifies
> > itself as [0/9], but the range-diff implies it should have 10
> > patches.
> >
> > Curious.
> >
> > In the meantime, let me resurrect the corresponding patch from the
> > previous, trusting that range-diff deems them identical.
> 
> Yes, it's identical. Sorry for missing that 1 patch.
> 
> I mis-typed git format-patch HEAD~9 instead of HEAD~10. :)

I can only recommend the use of b4. It will make your life a ton easier
with mailing list based workflows as you don't have to manually keep
track of shenanigans like that.

Patrick