From: Patrick Steinhardt Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 12:22:03 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] submodule--helper: replace malloc with xmalloc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20260310121013.39291-1-r.siddharth.shrimali@gmail.com> On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 05:40:13PM +0530, Siddharth Shrimali wrote: > The submodule_summary_callback() function currently uses a raw malloc() > which could lead to NULL pointer dereference. > > Standardize this by replacing malloc() with xmalloc() for error handling. > Also, remove the unnecessary type cast and use sizeof(*temp) instead of > struct name in xmalloc to improve maintainability of the code. > > Signed-off-by: Siddharth Shrimali > --- > builtin/submodule--helper.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/builtin/submodule--helper.c b/builtin/submodule--helper.c > index 143f7cb3cc..f3e132888f 100644 > --- a/builtin/submodule--helper.c > +++ b/builtin/submodule--helper.c > @@ -1160,7 +1160,7 @@ static void submodule_summary_callback(struct diff_queue_struct *q, > > if (!S_ISGITLINK(p->one->mode) && !S_ISGITLINK(p->two->mode)) > continue; > - temp = (struct module_cb*)malloc(sizeof(struct module_cb)); > + temp = xmalloc(sizeof(*temp)); > temp->mod_src = p->one->mode; > temp->mod_dst = p->two->mode; > temp->oid_src = p->one->oid; Yup, looks good to me, and all the other while-at-it changes are sensible, as well. Thanks! Patrick