From: Patrick Steinhardt Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 06:33:03 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] ci: make test slicing consistent across Meson/Make Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20260210225401.GA1837188@coredump.intra.peff.net> On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 05:54:01PM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 02:15:13PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > diff --git a/.github/workflows/main.yml b/.github/workflows/main.yml > > > index 2b175dc5c6..1b7a16e1f1 100644 > > > --- a/.github/workflows/main.yml > > > +++ b/.github/workflows/main.yml > > > @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ jobs: > > > path: build > > > - name: Test > > > shell: pwsh > > > - run: ci/run-test-slice-meson.sh build ${{matrix.nr}} 10 > > > + run: ci/run-test-slice-meson.sh build ${{matrix.nr + 1}} 10 > > > - name: print test failures > > > if: failure() && env.FAILED_TEST_ARTIFACTS != '' > > > shell: bash > > > > Have we successfully run this one? I haven't kicked off a GitHub workflow for this patch series. Guess I should've done that. I've created https://github.com/git/git/pull/2195 now to give v2 a test run first. > > I am getting > > > > Invalid workflow file: .github/workflows/main.yml#L1 > > (Line: 153, Col: 12): Unexpected symbol: '+'. Located at position 11 > > within expression: matrix.nr + 1, (Line: 301, Col: 12): Unexpected > > symbol: '+'. Located at position 11 within expression: matrix.nr + 1 > > > > https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/25386 is a 6-year old > > discussion so things may have changed quite a lot, but at least back > > then the claim was > > > > Github actions doesn’t support math operations in expressions > > inside ${{ }}. You could add up these two numbers in bash script and > > then use set-env command to give its value to an environment > > variable ... > > > > though. > > Right, that's why we used pwsh syntax to do it before, in d3d6493dcf > (ci: use Meson's new `--slice` option, 2025-07-09). > > That went away in 17bd1108ea (ci(windows-meson-test): handle options and > output like other test jobs, 2025-11-18), because the "+1" was added > into the script itself there. It looks like the patch under discussion > removes the +1 from the script, so we'd need to go back to the pwsh > syntax. Indeed, will fix. Thanks! Patrick