From: Taylor Blau Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2025 20:44:03 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/49] repack: prepare for incremental MIDX-based repacking Message-ID: In-Reply-To: On Sun, Sep 28, 2025 at 03:58:00PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Taylor Blau writes: > > > * This series depends on ps/packfile-store at dd52a29b78 (packfile: > > refactor `get_packed_git_mru()` to work on packfile store, > > 2025-09-23). > > > > * This series is split out of my local copy of > > tb/incremental-midx-part-3. I suggest queueing it as > > tb/incremental-midx-part-3.1 ;-). > > Both of these comments are very much appreciated. Do we say > something to encourage these in our developer-facing documentation? Thanks. > The points to stress are: > > - If you are not building directly on top of the recent tip of > 'master', mention what topics that are not yet in 'master' your > patches depend on. I think that this one is covered in general by 0a02ca2383 (SubmittingPatches: simplify guidance for choosing a starting point, 2023-07-14). The language added there is a little more generic, since it suggests mentioning how you constructed a base branch when a new topic depends on >1 other topics. I would imagine it's clear to readers there that "if I am describing how to build a base branch which merges in multiple topics, I should likewise list the topic branch by name if I am building on top of a single one already in the maintainer's tree." > - If your series is a part of a larger effort, briefly describe > what your overall direction and grand vision is, and state where > in that grand picture the current series fits. Not covered. > - If you have a short one-line summary for the topic to be used as > a topic branch name in mind, do suggest it. Sort of covered by your d255105c99 (SubmittingPatches: release-notes entry experiment, 2024-03-25), but that talks more about the summary for RelNotes purposes, not the topic branch name. I'll send out a short series to add some more guidelines to cover the above in our Documentation/SubmittingPatches. > Thanks. Thanks, Taylor