From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2025 02:42:49 GMT
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2025, #01; Tue, 1)
Message-ID: <aGScqbG2SGSK8Hwg@pks.im>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqwm8rh00m.fsf@gitster.g>

On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 06:08:57PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * ps/object-store (2025-07-01) 17 commits
>  - odb: rename `read_object_with_reference()`
>  - odb: rename `pretend_object_file()`
>  - odb: rename `has_object()`
>  - odb: rename `repo_read_object_file()`
>  - odb: rename `oid_object_info()`
>  - odb: trivial refactorings to get rid of `the_repository`
>  - odb: get rid of `the_repository` when handling submodule sources
>  - odb: get rid of `the_repository` when handling the primary source
>  - odb: get rid of `the_repository` in `for_each()` functions
>  - odb: get rid of `the_repository` when handling alternates
>  - odb: get rid of `the_repository` in `odb_mkstemp()`
>  - odb: get rid of `the_repository` in `assert_oid_type()`
>  - odb: get rid of `the_repository` in `find_odb()`
>  - odb: introduce parent pointers
>  - object-store: rename files to "odb.{c,h}"
>  - object-store: rename `object_directory` to `odb_source`
>  - object-store: rename `raw_object_store` to `object_database`
> 
>  Code clean-up around object access API.
> 
>  Comments?
>  source: <20250701-pks-object-store-wo-the-repository-v6-0-dbf3894ab4e2@pks.im>

From my point of view this should be good enough now. The only
contentious point really was the renaming of `struct object_directory`.
The current iteration of `struct odb_source` seems to be something that
everyone can agree to, so I don't plan to iterate on this series any
further.

Patrick