From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 13:22:35 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] status: compare against both upstream and push branch by default
Message-ID: <a5fa416c-da26-4f7d-8a66-3dd11ed7937c@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHwyqnU1NPp3N7Qv3ChEPCo-mL=gASeG334YFg2tczzLomsm6A@mail.gmail.com>

On 20/10/2026 11:19, Harald Nordgren wrote:
> > As a side note:
> > I see that you include the whole message in replies, leaving
> responders to clean it, so more work for multiple people instead of
> more work for a single person. Isn't the convention to only include
> the parts that you are responding to?
I tend not to trim the message below my signature (which indicates the end of my comments), but I do trim the context above it. I aim to leave enough context that someone reading my reply can comprehend it without needing to read the message I'm replying to. In this case the original commit message was only a couple of paragraphs and I though it was relevant context for my reply so I left it in. As a thread gets longer I'll trim earlier discussions more aggressively.

Thanks

Phillip