From: Phillip Wood Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 10:52:13 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] replay: die descriptively when invalid commit-ish Message-ID: In-Reply-To: On 23/12/2025 03:12, Junio C Hamano wrote: > kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com writes: > > How many callers use this function? I am wondering if it is better > to give a better message at the caller(s), rather than here, where > we lack context to tell something like "You gave string 'ource' as > the argument to the '--onto' option, but 'ource' does not name any > commit" (in other words, "for what our caller is trying to peel > to a commit"). There are only two callers so I think that is a good idea. If you give an invalid commit name to "--advance" then it dies with fatal: argument to --advance must be a reference so arguably we only need to check the return value when parsing "--onto" Thanks Phillip