From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 15:44:07 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] refs: tone down the dwimmery in refname_match() for {heads,tags,remotes}/*
Message-ID: <a40c5388-4274-6bfa-4213-6013601c8fae@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqef4jewj6.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>

On 27/05/19 17:39, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I do not think lightweight vs annotated should be the issue.  The
> tag that the requestor asks to be pulled (from repository ../b)
> should be what the requestor has locally when writing the request
> (in repository .).  Even if both tags at remote and local are
> annotated, we should still warn if they are different objects, no?

Right, lightweight vs annotated then is the obvious special case where
one of the two is a commit and the other is a tag, hence they ought not
to have the same SHA1.  I'll take a look.

Paolo