From: darcy Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2024 04:56:08 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] date: detect underflow when parsing dates with positive timezone offset Message-ID: In-Reply-To: On 6/6/24 03:27, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Phillip Wood writes: > >> Thanks for taking a closer look, I wasn't aware of that. Reading >> Peff's reply it seems like timestamp is actually unsigned and as we >> limit the maximum year to 2099 it seems unlikely we'll overflow from >> too larger date after all. > Thanks all. > > I haven't seen one question I posed answered, though. Has > https://git.github.io/htmldocs/SubmittingPatches.html#real-name > been followed in this patch when signing off the patch? I have changed the line in the commit to properly follow that rule.