From: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2018 18:49:19 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fsck: use oidset for skiplist
Message-ID: <a2577ecd-52a4-1343-a0b8-bbf1883db619@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <bc9f21c6-b362-2e3f-1820-7da93a76a7c8@ramsayjones.plus.com>

Am 11.08.2018 um 22:48 schrieb Ramsay Jones:
> On 11/08/18 16:47, René Scharfe wrote:
>> @@ -34,12 +36,12 @@ struct fsck_options {
>>      fsck_error error_func;
>>      unsigned strict:1;
>>      int *msg_type;
>> -    struct oid_array *skiplist;
>> +    struct oidset skiplist;
>>      struct decoration *object_names;
>>  };
>>  
>> -#define FSCK_OPTIONS_DEFAULT { NULL, fsck_error_function, 0, NULL }
>> -#define FSCK_OPTIONS_STRICT { NULL, fsck_error_function, 1, NULL }
>> +#define FSCK_OPTIONS_DEFAULT { NULL, fsck_error_function, 0, NULL, OIDSET_INIT }
>> +#define FSCK_OPTIONS_STRICT { NULL, fsck_error_function, 1, NULL, OIDSET_INIT }
> 
> Note that a NULL initialiser, for the object_names field, is missing
> (not introduced by this patch). Since you have bumped into the 80th
> column, you may not want to add that NULL to the end of these macros
> (it is not _necessary_ after all). However, ... :-D

Exactly my thoughts -- except the "However" part. :)

I even thought about reordering the struct to move the NULL-initialized
elements to the end, allowing us to drop them from the initializer, but
felt that this would be a bit too much..

René