From: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 19:06:40 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] git-compat-util: use gettimeofday(2) for time(2)
Message-ID: <ZBoAQFCWGhwIO963@nand.local>
In-Reply-To: <20230321182252.GJ3119834@coredump.intra.peff.net>

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 02:22:52PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> The disadvantage is that it's longer to type, and that you have to
> declare a timeval in the caller. So maybe it's a dumb idea.

I don't think it's a dumb idea per-se, but I think that being able to
pass `time(NULL)` around without having to create a timeval and pass a
pointer to *it* before then giving that timeval to some other function
is a nice advantage.

So, yeah, we probably should just avoid calling time() altogether, but
in practice I like the solution of redefining time() to do the right
thing and implement it by calling gettimeofday().

...Which is a long way of saying that I agree with you that this
approach looks good, and that I'd like to avoid putting time() in the
list of banned functions.

Thanks,
Taylor