From: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:35:16 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mktree: learn about promised objects
Message-ID: <YqkpRE8nykqVv8cn@nand.local>
In-Reply-To: <574dc4a9-b3c7-1fd3-8c0e-39071117c7f0@github.com>

On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 01:27:18PM -0400, Derrick Stolee wrote:
> > Did you have any other sort of performance test in mind? The remotes we
> > typically deal with are geographically far away and deal with a high volume
> > of traffic so we're keen to move behaviour to the client where it makes sense
> > to do so.
>
> I guess I wonder how large your promisor pack-files are in this test,
> since your implementation depends on for_each_packed_object(), which
> should be really inefficient if you're actually dealing with a large
> partial clone.

I had the same thought. Storing data available in the promisor packs
into an oid_map is going to be expensive if there are many such objects.

Is there a reason that we can't introduce a variant of
find_kept_pack_entry() that deals only with .promisor packs and look
these things up as-needed?

Thanks,
Taylor