From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 09:14:17 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/19] t6300: make `%(raw:size) --shell` test more robust
Message-ID: <YbMaadyT+YmZeGlB@coredump.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <20211209051115.52629-7-sunshine@sunshineco.com>

On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 12:11:02AM -0500, Eric Sunshine wrote:

> This test populates its `expect` file solely by appending content but
> fails to ensure that the file starts out empty. The test succeeds only
> because no earlier test populated a file of the exact same name, however
> this is an accident waiting to happen. Make the test more robust by
> ensuring that it contains exactly the intended content.

Agreed.

> While at it, simplify the implementation via a straightforward `sed`
> application and by avoiding dropping out of the single-quote context
> within the test body (thus eliminating a hard-to-digest combination of
> apostrophes and backslashes).

I find them equally ugly. :) The most confusing thing is that we are not
doing any shell quoting at all, just adding single-quote wrappers. But
that is OK because %(raw:size) should never need quoting.

Your solution seems fine to me.

-Peff