From: Johannes Schindelin Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:16:32 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Bisect dunno Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20071014142826.8caa0a9f.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Hi, On Sun, 14 Oct 2007, Christian Couder wrote: > Here is my bisect dunno patch series again. > The changes since last time are the following: > > [PATCH 1/7] rev-list: implement --bisect-all > [PATCH 2/7] Bisect: fix some white spaces and empty lines breakages. > > -> No change. > > [PATCH 3/7] Bisect: implement "bisect dunno" to mark untestable revisions. > > -> Added dunno stuff in "bisect_replay" that I had forgotten. > -> Use "bisect_write_good" and "bisect_write_bad" in "bisect_replay" > while at it. > > [PATCH 4/7] Bisect: factorise "bisect_write_*" functions. > [PATCH 5/7] Bisect: factorise some logging into "bisect_write". > [PATCH 6/7] Bisect: factorise "bisect_{bad,good,dunno}" into "bisect_state". > > -> Some new factorisation and clean up work. > > [PATCH 7/7] Bisect: add "bisect dunno" to the documentation. > > -> Document "bisect dunno" and fix some short usage descriptions. Thanks for doing this. I think that especially the factorisation adds tremendously to the readibility. Ciao, Dscho