From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 21:54:46 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add git-rev-list --invert-match
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709202252570.28395@racer.site>
In-Reply-To: <7vtzppj9d1.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

Hi,

On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> > Further, it probably makes sense to have the option to say _both_: 
> > "Find me a commit that contains Bart in one line, but not Simpson, and 
> > that does not contain the word "Sverdoolaege" at all."
> 
> Yeah.  And I think we would also want to have that at the
> underlying "grep" layer wouldn't we?

That's what I tried to get at...  Already on IRC, I tried to direct the 
attention to that thread on the list...  There I had an ugly patch, which 
was incomplete, mainly because I did not sort out the semantics first.

But the idea was to put this into grep.c so that both git-log and git-grep 
could benefit from that feature.

Ciao,
Dscho