From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:11:43 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix parallel make problem
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708311711210.28586@racer.site>
In-Reply-To: <20070831160043.GA1973@mellanox.co.il>

Hi,

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:

> > Quoting Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix parallel make problem
> > 
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@dev.mellanox.co.il> writes:
> > 
> > >> > So how did this end up in your mail?
> > >> 
> > >> Because it is not a format-patch output.
> > >> 
> > >> I often run "git diff --stat -p HEAD" from inside MUA in order
> > >> to get the patch from my work tree, write a proposed commit
> > >> message, and then reset the change away without committing after
> > >> sending that message (yes I do not need "git stash" --- gmane
> > >> and vger are my stashes, Mwhhhaaaa).
> > >
> > > So maybe we can suppress the warning when the output is not a tty?
> > 
> > What's your point?
> 
> Well, git diff currently says "consider running git-status", and one
> wanders why doesn't it just go ahead and run git status instead
> of asking the user to do it.

I knew why I was opposed to that change.  But others shouted louder, I 
guess.

Ciao,
Dscho