From: Johannes Schindelin Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:28:58 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Add for_each_remote() function, and extend remote_find_tracking() Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7vtzscqf2r.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Hi, On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > The function for_each_remote() does exactly what the name suggests. > > > > The function remote_find_tracking() was extended to be able to search > > remote refs for a given local ref. You have to set the parameter > > "reverse" to true for that behavior. > > The updated patch does not use "reverse" but the old description > is still there. Urgh. Right. May I ask you to paste this instead? The function remote_find_tracking() was extended to be able to search remote refs for a given local ref. You have to set either src or dst in the refspec, and remote_find_tracking() will fill in the other and return 0. > Daniel, one thing I fear about your "I want to store the message > in the object store so that I can reuse even after I re-polish > the series" desire on the cover letter topic is this kind of > gotcha, and that is why I suggested "*** BLURB GOES HERE ***". I am happy that my fsckup served a purpose, then. (And maybe this would be a good hint in rebase -i's man page, too, since that is how the error was introduced here.) Ciao, Dscho