From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 08:38:47 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/21] Free mktag's buffer before dying
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706100927050.4059@racer.site>
In-Reply-To: <200706090216.41856.johan@herland.net>

Hi,

On Sat, 9 Jun 2007, Johan Herland wrote:

How does this:

> -		usage("git-mktag < signaturefile");
> +		usage("git-mktag < tag_data_file");

and this:

> -

relate with your commit message?

You might understand that people _could_ get the impression that the 
patches were not very carefully crafted. Or even worse, the impression, 
that it was tried to slip some changes by, with a totally unrelated 
"official" purpose. (Again, reminds me of politics: it's like 
slipping an intrusive privacy law into an agriculture related law at the 
11th hour, just before Christmas, when people do not really pay 
attention.)

Ciao,
Dscho