From: Johannes Schindelin Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 11:04:45 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimized cvsexportcommit: calling 'cvs status' only once instead of once per changed file. Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <0056A63A-D511-4FDD-82A6-A13B06E237E9@zib.de> Hi, On Wed, 9 May 2007, Steffen Prohaska wrote: > The old implementation executed 'cvs status' for each file touched by > the patch to be applied. I did not follow development of that script closely, but could it be that this is a safety valve, to make it unlikely to commit something which was changed by somebody else in the meantime? Ciao, Dscho