From: Julian Phillips Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 14:28:55 GMT Subject: Re: Git benchmarks at OpenOffice.org wiki Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200705021158.04481.andyparkins@gmail.com> On Wed, 2 May 2007, Andy Parkins wrote: > On Wednesday 2007 May 02, Julian Phillips wrote: > >> A fully packed clone of the OOo git repo was indeed 1.3G, and the entrire >> checkout + repo was indeed 8.5G (using git 1.5.1.2). oops, meant 2.7G not 8.5G there ... sorry, was working from memory. jp3@electron: ooo(unxsplash)>du -sh .git 1.3G .git jp3@electron: ooo(unxsplash)>du -sh . 2.7G . jp3@electron: ooo(unxsplash)>ls .git/objects/ info pack > I'm more confused now then. I assumed the figures were accurate, but they > cannot be: > > CVS git SVN > Size of data on the server 8.5G 1.3G n/a > Size of checkout 1.4G 2.8G 1.5G > > I don't doubt the 1.3G on the server - and assume that is fully packed. The > checkout sizes are suspicious though. Is that 2.8G packed? > - If it is, then we can deduce that this is a repo+source size, since the > server is packed size+0 therefore the size of the source tree is > 2.8G - 1.3G = 1.5G the difference between 2.7G and 2.8G may be due to filesystem difference? > In which case the other figures are wrong: > - CVS checkout is 1.4G - impossible, the source tree is 1.5G. And where is > the overhead of the CVS directories which would make it more than 1.5G? > - SVN checkout overhead is always _at least_ the size of the source tree > because it keeps a pristine copy of HEAD. If the source tree is 1.5G, > then this figure should be at least 3G. I was wondering about the subversion figures too ... > - If it is not, then we're back to "I don't believe that git was packed" > > Something smells fishy here - either the source tree size is included in some, > but not in others or the git repository wasn't packed. 1.3G is the packed size ... jp3@electron: ooo(unxsplash)>ls -sh .git/objects/pack/ total 1.3G 37M pack-87efcac9bcb117328e8a1b0c1b42c88c3603c5b7.idx 1.2G pack-87efcac9bcb117328e8a1b0c1b42c88c3603c5b7.pack -- Julian --- To err is humor.