From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:59:49 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Replacing the system call pread() with lseek()/xread()/lseek() sequence.
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701091958170.4964@xanadu.home>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0701100041310.22628@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>

On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> 
> > Stefan-W. Hahn wrote:
> >
> > > +        if (current_offset != lseek(fd, current_offset, SEEK_SET))
> > > +                return -1;
> > 
> > How likely are we ever to be in the right place here?
> 
> You mean something like
> 
> 	if (current_offset != offset + count &&
> 			current_offset != lseek(fd, current_offset, SEEK_SET))
> 		return -1;
> 
> instead? Seems cheap enough.

In the index-pack case it simply will never happen.


Nicolas