From: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 03:28:32 GMT
Subject: Re: Since when is a tag a commit?
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608072325390.9789@iabervon.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060808021251.GA19548@spearce.org>

On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Shawn Pearce wrote:

> What the heck is going on?  Since when did git cat-file happily
> consider a tag to be a tag, a commit and a tree?  Its that
> intentional that we're peeling back the object to the requested type?

I think it's done that for a long time now. All of the other commands that 
take a tree or a commit will accept a tag, so why shouldn't "git cat-file 
tree"?

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*