From: Nicolas Pitre Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 01:54:31 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] count-delta.c: Match the delta data semantics change in version 3. Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7vbqxg3tdd.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Junio C Hamano writes: > > > I agree with the general direction and this futureproofing is a > > good thing to have before 1.2.0, I think. > > > > The bit is however _already_ looked at by the count_delta(), > > to assess the extent of damage, IIRC. Should we be > > futureproofing that bit as well? > > Something like this? Right. Nicolas