From: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 22:22:19 GMT
Subject: Re: git-index-pack really does suck..
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0704061521320.24050@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz>
In-Reply-To: <7vlkh5i0e7.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Subject: Re: git-index-pack really does suck..
> 
> Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> writes:
>
>> David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, Alex Riesen wrote:
>>> ...
>>>> You never know what pull is networked (or should I say: remote enough
>>>> to cause a collision).
>>>
>>> so leave it on for all pulls, but for other commands don't turn it on.
>>>
>>> remember that the command that linus ran into at the start of the
>>> thread wasn't a pull.
>>
>> Are you referring to this command
>>
>>  $ git index-pack --stdin --fix-thin new.pack < .git/objects/pack/pack-*.pack
>>
>> in this message?
>
>  From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
>  Subject: git-index-pack really does suck..
>  Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 08:15:12 -0700 (PDT)
>  Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704030754020.6730@woody.linux-foundation.org>
>
> (sorry, chomped the message).

probably (I useually don't keep the mail after I read or reply to it)

David Lang