From: Johannes Schindelin Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:35:06 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-bundle: fix pack generation. Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <30e4a070703070834s3dd5bdd7x2e1639aa2979d1cf@mail.gmail.com> Hi, On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Mark Levedahl wrote: > On 3/6/07, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > > git-bundle create test.bdl HEAD --since=1.day.ago ==>> pack with > > > 1531 objects > > > > Did you test with "--since=1.day.ago HEAD", i.e. with the correct > > order? I know you'd like the options to be interminglable, but "HEAD" > > really is not an option, but an argument. > > Changing the order of arguments makes no difference, same result either > way. We don't do thin packs. Should we? I guess that $ git ls-tree -r HEAD | wc results in something close to 1500 in that repo. Which basically means that the 1531 objects (including trees and the commit) sounds correct. Of course, we _could_ make the packs thin, but the disadvantage would be that we can never decide at a later stage to allow shallow fetches from that bundle. The advantage of the thin packs would be that the bundles would be much smaller. Ciao, Dscho