From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 09:32:16 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] --walk-reflogs: disallow uninteresting commits
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0701201029400.22628@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
In-Reply-To: <7v64b29naa.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

Hi,

On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> > 	> I think people may also appreciate timestamps on Reflog headers 
> > 	> you add to the output.
> >
> > 	At the moment, if you ask for @{1} (or leave it out), you will see 
> > 	them enumerated by number. If you ask for @{now}, you will see 
> > 	them identified by date...
> 
> Thanks.  This certainly needs a better documentation -- the attached is
> my try.

;-)

I sort of waited for comments on this behaviour. Maybe it would be better 
to always show the number, _and_ a relative time? I.e.

	Reflog @{2}: master@{17.5 minutes ago} (message)

> By the way, I haven't looked into it, but does this ring a bell?
> 
>     $ git-log --walk-reflogs -1 --pretty=s master@{1.day}
>     commit 72fe6a59890870ed9c3e9e1e6381fc0d7ba75fe4
>     Reflog: master@{Thu, 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000} ((null))
>     Reflog message: (null)Author: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
> 
>         Documentation: Generate command lists.

Not yet. Will look into it.

Ciao,
Dscho