From: Johannes Schindelin Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:42:51 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] Replacing the system call pread() with lseek()/xread()/lseek() sequence. Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <45A40C15.1070200@shadowen.org> Hi, On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > Stefan-W. Hahn wrote: > > > + if (current_offset != lseek(fd, current_offset, SEEK_SET)) > > + return -1; > > How likely are we ever to be in the right place here? You mean something like if (current_offset != offset + count && current_offset != lseek(fd, current_offset, SEEK_SET)) return -1; instead? Seems cheap enough. Ciao, Dscho