From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:44:59 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] Improve merge performance by avoiding in-index merges.
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0612291840450.19693@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
In-Reply-To: <20061228082441.GB18029@spearce.org>

Hi,

On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Shawn Pearce wrote:

> From what I can tell, merge-recursive and read-tree -m are running
> exactly the same code.

That was the idea of tags/v1.4.3~333^2 "read-tree: move merge functions 
to the library" and v1.4.3~236^2~10 "merge-recur: use the unpack_trees() 
interface instead of exec()ing read-tree".

Ciao,
Dscho