From: Johannes Schindelin Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:27:35 GMT Subject: Re: git and time Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20060926232316.98065.qmail@web51009.mail.yahoo.com> Hi, On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Matthew L Foster wrote: > After seeing how git currently accepts a remote repository's timestamp > it occurred to me that git should probably instead prefer the time a > particular changeset was committed to _this_ repository. Git accepts it, but does not rely on it. Instead, it relies on parent-child relations. Hth, Dscho