From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 13:54:19 GMT
Subject: recur status on linux-2.6
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0608131550290.10541@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>

Hi,

I tested git-merge-recur vs. git-merge-recursive on the linux-2.6 
repository last night. It contains 2298 two-head merges. _All_ of them 
come out identically with -recur as compared to -recursive (looking at 
the resulting index only).

That was the good news. The bad news is: it _seems_, that -recur is only 
about 6x faster than -recursive, not 10x, and this number becomes smaller, 
the longer the merge takes. So I see a startup effect here, probably.

Ciao,
Dscho