From: Linus Torvalds Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:28:07 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] pack-objects: emit base before delta. Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7vbr5nxe38.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > This micro-optimizes the order of objects in a pack. By > emitting base objects before deltified ones, unpack-objects do > not keep items on delta_list. So I like this from an unpacking standpoint, but at the same time I don't actually think it's correct from an access pattern standpoint. When using a pack file as a run-time object store, the current packing order means that we generally traverse the pack-file in a nice forward direction. We don't jump backwards in the file very much, which should be good both for CPU and disk caches (both of them tend to have prefetch logic that often works better for nice access patterns). So I was actually pretty happy with the fact that we packed "optimally" in this sense: if the object was an important delta (ie an early one), we'd basically end up always walking forward until we hit the object it was a delta against. I dunno. Maybe it doesn't matter. Our other heuristics to pack recent objects before later one might mean that we tend to have mainly backwards-going deltas (both in history _and_ in pack file layout). The expense of keeping track of delta objects isn't that high, and the "pending delta" logic in unpack-objects isn't that complicated, so .. Do you have some other reason you want to do this? Linus