From: Linus Torvalds Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 23:32:47 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Tweak diff output further to make it a bit less distracting. Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7vsm0lqym3.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> On Tue, 17 May 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Now, in the new diff format, if the rename is really a pure > rename, then we would have: > > diff -git a/nitfol b/nitfol > rename old frotz > rename new nitfol > diff -git a/rezrov b/rezrov > --- a/rezrov > +++ b/rezrov > @@ ... > > that is, nothing until the patch for the next file or EOF. Is > this acceptable? I think that's exactly what we want. At least it does exactly the right thing for me, when I do '/^diff ' in less, with nice highlighting of the headers. With people inevitably adding some nice coloration support in gitweb etc, and it will be outstanding. Linus