From: karsten.blees@dcon.de Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:36:06 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] update-index/diff-index: use core.preloadindex to improve performance Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20121102153800.GE11170@sigill.intra.peff.net> Jeff King wrote on 02.11.2012 16:38:00: > On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 11:26:16AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > > Still, I don't think we need to worry about performance regressions, > > because people who don't have a setup suitable for it will not turn on > > core.preloadindex in the first place. And if they have it on, the more > > places we use it, probably the better. > > BTW, your patch was badly damaged in transit (wrapped, and tabs > converted to spaces). I was able to fix it up, but please check your > mailer's settings. > Yes, I feared as much, that's why I included the pull URL (the company MTA only accepts outbound mail from Notes clients, sorry). Is there a policy for people with broken mailers (send patch as attachment, add pull URL more prominently, don't include plaintext patch at all...)?