From: Lidong Yan Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 09:50:56 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] diff: stop output garbled message in dry run mode Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20251018094722.GC1060824@coredump.intra.peff.net> Jeff King writes: > > On Sat, Oct 18, 2025 at 09:11:34AM +0800, Lidong Yan wrote: > >>> Test that exercises "git diff -I" is in line with what the >>> original b55e6d36eb wanted to address, but given that we saw a >>> recent regression report like [*], I would have liked to see "git >>> diff --quiet" in the test as well. >> >> I will read Peff’s test and see if I should also add some similar tests > > What I was hoping was that we'd apply my patch, as a matter of release > engineering (backing out the regression-causing bit of b55e6d36eb). And > then you could make more-specific fixes on top (since -I would still > have potential problems). And then you don't need to add a test for the > regression case, since it's already there. > > -Peff Sorry I sent my patch before I noticed this message. Lidong