From: David Caldwell <david@porkrind.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 05:49:22 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] stash: Add --clean option to stash and remove all untracked files
Message-ID: <FD779A88A6134648D999E7C7@black.porkrind.org>

On 6/21/11 5:23 PM -0400 Marc Branchaud wrote:

> On 11-06-21 12:11 PM, Paul Ebermann wrote:
>>
>> I think `--also-untracked` sounds better. It is even longer, though.
>>
>> There could also be `--only-untracked`, which would stack only the
>> untracked files (and let changes of tracked files there).
>
> Perhaps -uall to match git-status's -u[<mode>] option (and also the long
> version thereof)?

Currently I'm playing with --include-untracked (-u) and --all (-a) while I 
fix a bug I found in the patch. I agree that --untracked sounds like it's 
only stashing the untracked files which isn't the case. I wasn't going to 
have an option to stash *just* the untracked files because I can't come up 
with a use case that makes sense. I still like "--clean", too.

-uall (like git status) isn't really the same thing which I think is 
confusing since it has the same name.

-David