From: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 22:12:17 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make strbuf_cmp inline, constify its arguments and optimize it a bit
Message-ID: <EF81F7DD-73C7-4B6F-92D2-4A143CA05365@wincent.com>
In-Reply-To: <20071007215432.GC2765@steel.home>

El 7/10/2007, a las 23:54, Alex Riesen escribió:

>> ... All the rest pretty much
>> was worse than what we started from in that it needed to reevaluate
>> more conditions and turned out more complicated and obfuscate even to
>> the human reader.
>
> it _is_ smaller. And it is _measurably_ faster on that thing I have at
> home (and old p4).

Can we see the numbers and the steps used to obtain them? I'm also a  
little bit confused about how an inlined function can lead to a  
smaller executable... or did you just mean lines-of-code?

Cheers,
Wincent