From: Geert Bosch <bosch@adacore.com>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 15:00:59 GMT
Subject: Re: git gc & deleted branches
Message-ID: <E1B43061-69C7-43D7-9A57-34B7C55DF345@adacore.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080509041921.GA14773@sigill.intra.peff.net>


On May 9, 2008, at 00:19, Jeff King wrote:

> I like it. It makes an easy rule to say "packed objects _never_ get
> pruned, they only get demoted to loose objects." And then of course
> we have sane rules for pruning loose objects.

Isn't there an issue with the "git gc" triggering because there
may be too many loose unreferenced objects?
Still, I do like the approach.

Maybe unreferenced objects and old refs should go to a .git/lost+found
directory and be expired from there. This has a couple of benefits:

   -  Easy to manually inspect or blow away any crud
   -  One git-gc run can make one pack in lost+found,
      avoiding huge numbers of loose objects (and massive disk use)
      when trying to do a large cleanup (to possibly reclaim disk space)
   -  Objects will not be accessible by ordinary git commands for a  
while,
      before they are really removed, avoiding surprises

Only some tools would look in the lost+found to restore stuff.

   -Geert