From: Farid Zakaria Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 22:26:57 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sequencer: honor --empty when a fixup!/squash! empties its target Message-ID: In-Reply-To: On Thu Aug 6, 2026 at 1:32 PM PDT, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Farid Zakaria" writes: > >> Let me know if you have any more comments. I suspect not much will >> changes logic-wise once I rebase it onto 'next'. >> >> For clarity, is the f85a7e6620 commit the 'next' branch ? I would have >> thought to just rebase ontop of 'next' and I'm a bit confused with this >> commit hash. >> >> If there is anything else I should be aware of, I would appreciate a CC >> if you can remember :) > > It has been quite a while since you received a reply from Phillip to > the quoted message above. Has there been any progress to share? > > Thanks. Hi Junio, Sorry I let this slip. I was waiting for the work to be accepted to avoid rebasing on top of a moving target -- I am still a little new to mailing list workflow & I have been using b4 (recommended from Linux). I will pick this up again soon.